ID: snap8
Aliases: SNAP-8, acetyl octapeptide-3, acetyl octapeptide
Type: compound
Route/form: topical or cosmetic microneedle formulation context; not systemic/injectable evidence
Status: cosmetic
Evidence level: early human
Best data tier: early human
Support scope: human, review/regulatory
Source types: human_trial, review
Linked sources: 2
Broad outcomes: Skin / wound repair
Reading note: These are curation notes anchored to linked sources, not a clinical recommendation or protocol.
Targets / mechanism
- SNARE/neurotransmitter-release mimicry hypothesis
- facial wrinkle appearance endpoints
- topical or microneedle delivery context
Optimization domains
- skin
- aesthetics
- cosmetic
- wrinkles
Research basis
- Human cosmetic microneedle/peptide formulation data exist for anti-wrinkle endpoints.
- Mechanism is commonly framed as a topical botulinum-like neurotransmission-modulating peptide claim.
Limits, risks, and missing evidence
- Evidence is cosmetic-product/formulation specific, not systemic peptide biology.
Risk flags
- cosmetic evidence context
- formulation specific
- route specific evidence
- not systemic evidence
Linked papers, labels, and reviews
- Efficacy of bioactive peptides loaded on hyaluronic acid microneedle patches: a monocentric clinical study
human_trial / pubmed_snap8_microneedle_2020
Cosmetic peptide microneedle study including acetyl octapeptide-3/SNAP-8-style anti-wrinkle mechanism. - Acetyl Hexapeptide-8 in cosmeceuticals: a review of skin permeability and efficacy
review / pubmed_cosmetic_peptides_review_2023
Mechanistic/cosmeceutical background for SNAP-25 mimic peptide claims; SNAP-8 itself has thinner independent literature than acetyl hexapeptide-8.